🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a proposed legislation that include lowering the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

The WHO specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would drive users to “black market” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We live in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with current country statutes. Additionally, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which encompasses growing volumes of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.