🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, coercive communications persisted. Originally, supposedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, and then from law enforcement directly. Finally, a local artisan asserts he was called to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: remain silent or encounter real trouble.

The leather artisan is among those fighting a multimillion-dollar initiative where Dharavi – a massive informal community with rich history – faces bulldozed and modernized by a large business group.

"The culture of Dharavi is unparalleled in the world," says Shaikh. "However they want to destroy our community and prevent our protests."

Dual Worlds

The cramped lanes of Dharavi present a dramatic difference to the high-rise structures and luxury apartments that dominate the neighborhood. Residences are assembled randomly and often without proper sanitation, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the air is filled with the unpleasant stench of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the vision of a renewed Dharavi into a modern district of luxury high-rises, well-maintained green spaces, shiny shopping centers and homes with two toilets is a hopeful vision realized.

"We don't have proper healthcare, paved pathways or water management and there's nowhere for kids to enjoy," explains A Selvin Nadar, 56, who relocated from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The only way is to demolish everything and provide modern residences."

Local Protest

However, some, including this protester, are opposing the plan.

None deny that Dharavi, consistently overlooked as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing investment and development. Yet they worry that this plan – without public consultation – could potentially transform a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into an elite enclave, evicting the marginalized, migrant communities who have lived there since the late 1800s.

These were these shunned, relocated individuals who built up the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and commercial output, whose output is estimated at between one million dollars and $2m per year, making it one of the world's largest unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Of the roughly 1 million people living in the dense 2.2 square kilometer area, fewer than half will be able for alternative accommodation in the development, which is projected to take seven years to complete. Others will be relocated to wastelands and coastal regions on the remote edges of the metropolis, potentially fragment a generations-old neighborhood. Certain individuals will not get residences at all.

Those allowed to continue living in Dharavi will be provided flats in multi-story structures, a major break from the organic, shared lifestyle of dwelling and laboring that has maintained the community for many years.

Businesses from tailoring to pottery and material recovery are projected to reduce in scale and be relocated to a specific "commercial zone" distant from people's residences.

Survival Challenge

For residents like this protester, a leather artisan and third generation of his family to live in the slum, the project presents a survival challenge. His rickety, three-storey facility creates apparel – formal jackets, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – sold in high-end shops in south Mumbai and overseas.

Household members resides in the spaces underneath and his workers and sewers – workers from north India – live in the same building, permitting him to sustain operations. Outside this community, Mumbai rents are typically significantly as high for basic accommodation.

Threats and Warning

In the administrative buildings in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project illustrates an alternative outlook. Fashionable people mill about on cycles and eco-friendly transport, acquiring continental baked goods and croissants and socializing on a terrace near a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This represents a complete departure from the affordable idli sambar morning meal and 5-rupee chai that supports the neighborhood.

"This represents no improvement for residents," states Shaikh. "It represents a huge land development that will make it unaffordable for residents to remain."

Furthermore, there's distrust of the corporate group. Run by a prominent businessman – among the country's wealthiest and an associate of the national leader – the corporation has been subject to claims of favoritism and ethical concerns, which it denies.

Even as administrative bodies describes it as a collaborative effort, the developer contributed $950m for its majority share. A lawsuit claiming that the redevelopment was unfairly awarded to the developer is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.

Ongoing Pressure

Since they began to vocally oppose the redevelopment, protesters and community members assert they have been experienced a long-running campaign of pressure and threats – comprising communications, clear intimidation and implications that criticizing the project was equivalent to anti-national sentiment – by people they claim work for the corporate group.

Included in these suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c