🔗 Share this article

Ben Meiselas proves extremely occupied person. To such an extent, he needs to interrupt our discussion partway through to carry out a separate interview for the following episode. This occurs at 7 a.m. LA time when we connect over video, and Meiselas is already deep into a further 18-hour day of recording, scheduling, speaking with guests, appointments, and other duties.

His pro-freedom channel the platform, which he manages with his brothers his siblings, puts out numerous videos each day, most of them hosted by Meiselas directly. “I had just finished a separate video before this,” he says, “and so by now I’ve already released an episode I recorded overnight, that was my pre-dawn slot, and now I completed my daybreak video – it’s about to go live any minute now. And then there will be an 8:30 a.m., a 10, an 11:30 a.m. …”

Growing Influence and Competitive Position

The extensive output contributes to how the channel is now among the top listened-to podcasts in the US, frequently surpassing the influential a major competitor in both video and audio metrics, and even exceeding a major news network in online video views.

Rogan and others in the pro-Trump audio sphere are thought to have affected the recent election in Donald Trump’s favor, prompting significant evaluation on the American left about its media game, and the reasons they require an influential voice on their side; MeidasTouch appears to have stepped in to provide an alternative.

News Critique and Expanded Challenges

The shortage extends far beyond digital shows, as he sees it. He expresses dismay at how mainstream outlets has behaved since Trump came to power. “There has been a full surrender,” he comments. “They are either corporate news – like broadcast channels, [which is] totally false equivalency the issues and purposely neglecting vital, fundamental things – or they’re simply state regime media like authoritarian states and Russia: some channels, OAN, a pro-Trump source … All of these entities are operated by rightwing influential figures; they serve as instruments to gain favor with the regime for further perks and financial motives.”

The event of CEOs and podcast bros alike “kissing the ring” at the presidential ceremony solidified this view early on. As an alternative, Meiselas aired four hours of adorable animals, collecting donations for a charity.

Unique Style and Discussion Technique

Should progressives wants its Joe Rogan, however, Meiselas may not meet the criteria. While Rogan tends to be casual, rambling and sometimes gullible of his guests’ unsubstantiated assertions, Meiselas remains precise, educated and critical. Unsurprisingly of a former trial lawyer, he communicates with a spontaneous eloquence (“no scripts, no notes – it helps build the connection I create with viewers”), and he provides evidence. If he has a catchphrase, he uses “play this clip” – when he demonstrates one more instance of Republican duplicity/hypocrisy/incompetence/deception/authoritarianism through multimedia.

He is capable of a rational host – recently he has spoken to Democrat representatives a senator and Hakeem Jeffries and freshman congresswoman an elected official. (He pauses the conversation to talk to an ex-official for the FCC regarding free speech and consolidation.) But over the course of a typical episode – ranging from a short individual segment or a lengthy discussion featuring his brothers – he frequently grows audibly outraged at what’s going on.

“We’re not talking abstract concepts. Viewers start every day thinking how this represents a critical issue personally.”

Style and Message

Combining these elements, regarding style the network is somewhere between underground reporting and entertainment analysis. He willingly criticizing harshly: the Republican house leader is often called as “Maga Mike Johnson”, for example, and he is as merciless on Trump’s well-being as the rightwing media was about Joe Biden’s. He is quick to share thoughts: “Why are they referring to?” “Stop making up claims and deceiving the American people.” “Certain individuals are unwell.” Their show names conform to the dramatic online style: “Trump is COLLAPSING during negotiations!!!”, “Trump seems terrible while speaking spirals out of control”. A reporter labeled MeidasTouch’s commentary as “seemingly calculated to attract viewers for which [a well-known host] a prominent journalist is too subtle.”

Outlook and Goal

Meiselas doesn’t regret for the network’s tone. “I avoid swearing,” he says. “I attempt to ensure it to the greatest extent suitable for all audiences. But on the other hand, I think when there are individuals that are cartoonishly evil, such as Maga Mike Johnson or another individual, framing them for the WWE cosplay characters they’ve become proves an accurate way to characterize their actions … I strive to represent the discourse {